Monday, 30 November 2015

Laxmi, Mahatma Gandhi’s daughter, albeit adopted




It was only when I read Mahadevbhai’s diaries that I came across references to Gandhiji’s adopted daughter, Laxmi. Ever since then, I have been curious about Laxmi and her life, not just as an academic but also as a woman. 

 
Being Gandhiji’s adopted daughter and having been brought up in the Gandhi ashram, her life would certainly not have been easy. Dudabhai and Daniben along with Laxmi, their daughter were the first Dalit family to join Gandhiji’s ashram in the year 1915 at Kochrab, Gujarat. [1] As a Dalit family they faced much hostility from both within and outside the ashram. Naturally it must have been very difficult for the young Laxmi to adapt to the ashram life. Therefore many questions come to my mind. How did Laxmi’s life span out eventually? Has she written anything about her experience of being Gandhiji’s adopted daughter or about her life in the Gandhi ashram? Where are her family members today?



Gandhiji's Ashram at Kochrab, Ahmedabad. Photo Source: http://www.gujarattourism.com/destination/details/7/31



While there is substantial material available on other experiments of Gandhiji like satyagraha, naturopathy, brahmacharya, fasts, I have not found much material on Laxmi and her life in the ashram as Gandhiji’s adopted daughter and later.


The reason why I write on this subject now, or the timing of this post is right now because I recently read an article by Gandhiji’s grandson, Gopalkrishna Gandhi in Indian Express dated 17 Nov 2015, titled: True successors of Gandhi – Nehru.[2] I found this article interesting also because he writes as follows: “If Gandhi had had a daughter — just one — in addition to his four sons and Nehru a son — just one — in addition to his daughter, would those two men have been any different? I cannot say they would have been but certainly, life around would have been different, very different.”





Kasturba Gandhi with her four sons. I have not been able to locate a photograph of Laxmi. Photo source: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kasturba_and_children.jpg


 


On reading this,  I was reminded of Laxmi, referred to in Mahadevbhai's diaries as Gandhiji’s adopted daughter. I also thought it would be interesting to share these references from the diaries with a wider readership, particularly against the backdrop of the article by Gopalkrishna Gandhi. Some excerpts from Mahadevbhai’s diaries here,  translated from Gujarati by me:

1. Volume 5, Year 1919 to 1921: [Gandhiji:] “ After having opened the satyagraha ashram in Ahmedabad, I had an antyaj ( belonging to the so called untouchable community) person Dudabhai and his wife stay at the ashram...the same Dudabhai’s daughter Laxmi moves about in my house like Laxmi (the Goddess) today...”
    
2. Volume 7, Year 1924 to1925: [Mahadevbhai:] ‘Botad- ... Botad is also Dudhabhai’s village and so Gandhiji was keen to go there first. After having spent considerable time at the satyagraha ashram, Dudabhai is running a school for the antyaj in Botad. From a very small school he has turned it into a school with ninety children. The meeting of the school was naturally at the Dhedhwada (Dalit locality). The children sang very nice bhajans and got prizes of khadi. Some people from the village were present but it is being said that Brahmins and some sanatani Hindus had boycotted the arrival of Gandhiji. 

'Gandhiji said, “...Do you know why I have come to Botad? I have come as Dudabhai has invited me. His daughter Laxmi, lives with me. She has been adopted by me. You all take her examination. Do see if she has improved after coming to the ashram or has she been spoilt. I don’t say that all the good qualities have been imbibed by Laxmi but you all can see how living together has influenced her. And I hope Laxmi will pass...

"I have heard that the brahmins of Botad have resolved that no Hindus come to this meeting...I can see that reasonably good number of people have come...We do not wish to do anything by creating poison...we are not having a dispute with the brahmins or anyone else...in being boycotted, your religion is being tested, you are being tested for the extent of faith you have in God. I follow one main path. One must walk in this world with the head bowed to all- not because we are sacred of anyone but because everyone should be respected...

 
“But you lack in cleanliness. You must take the example of Laxmi and see if she remains clean or not- both from within and outside. At dawn daily, you should pray to lord Ram that the way in which I clean my body, do clean the dirt within me ...You cannot say at all that, “What is it to others no matter how much addiction  we may have or drunk we may be?”

“Let more students get admitted here and let Dudabhai live long. And in that blessing I hope that all of you become good with the touch of Dudabhai. Prahlad suffered a lot but he was never angry at those who gave him sorrow. You all must understand that by doing your duty you have won the world...”

[Mahadevbhai:]‘The boycott of sanatani was only momentary. Because no sooner had Gandhiji visited Dhedhvada (Dalit Basti), that he was taken to the village and there was big festivity at the Darbargadh (Palace). There Gandhiji said, “...Untouchability is a sin...and so long as we do not remove untouchability Hindustan will not progress...Dudabhai prays to God, he teaches children. To believe he is an untouchable is a sin...”

3. Volume 8, Year 1925: 1-11-25 Gandhiji said: “...I told my wife (Kasturba), if my and your religions are different then it is appropriate to build and live in separate huts, but you cannot force me to not keep Laxmi with me, and I too cannot force you to keep Laxmi with you...”
 
4. Volume 9, Year 1926:  This is a noting in Mahadevbhai’s diary about the sharing of incidents or explanations given by Gandhiji in the ashram during/after the prayers:

 “29-4-1926...I have offered everything/sacrificed everything over that girl. The game of swaraj (independence) is like a ball’s play. Sometimes one side will win and sometimes the opposite side will win. There is no issue of happiness or sadness in it. But if any of my children falls low than my blood dries up. And what is more, Laxmi is my first born/child. I have taken her for the atonement of sins against the antyaj.  That is why I am showering a lot of love on her. But that girl has been giving limitless disappointments. I had never believed that she can stoop so low...when children betray, I feel very sad. Because children are innocent. I had the same hopes about Laxmi. There should not be so much sin at such a small age as eleven.

“The pot of sin broke within 4 days. Felt like beating with a stick...then thought even fast can be undertaken. But again thought that if I will undertake fast then there will be a great calamity in the ashram, there will be more anger on the girl than what already exists, and the attitude towards antyaj will become worse. Thinking of all this my heart became as hard as a stone. No, we don’t want to do that; and I kept staring. Devdas, who has the strength to influence, went to fetch. She came with him by force. Then I got up. “Don’t beat me,” she started saying. I said, “I will not do anything now. Will send you off to Dudabhai.” Today did not have to wake her up and so I felt good. I open my eyes after prayers for all of you- otherwise I would not open my eyes at all and remain in meditation. But right now I cannot remain in meditation. I told her to stand up. I did not tell her to get up as a punishment. She did not listen. I told her to run away from there. She went and sat with the excuse of studying.

“Now even if I say (pray) “take me to light after darkness,” how will that happen? I have not been able to sleep at all today morning. She asked me for eight days' time. That she has asked to be allowed to keep standing for half an hour, could be because of her fear to be sent off to Botad [Laxmi’s father was a teacher at Botad]. I have removed that fear too. She said that she will complete the stolen threads. She will complete 2500 threads daily. That she obeys and does not lie, so long as these two things exist, there is a hope for improvement. I am confident that I can turn the dumbest of all children, like me. But there are two conditions for this, not to lie and not to be obstinate before me. If that girl does not improve I feel disgraced towards myself; and I must leave the hope of her having a humane nature.  If she cannot be good, how can I be good? I want to link her thread to mine. Her strength is my strength. Otherwise the prayer sung in the morning...will prove to be false. If she remains mean for ever then I too remain mean forever- there will be difference of only degrees, but both of us will remain of the same kind-antyaj.

5.Volume 14, Year 1931: [Mahadevbhai:] “...Caught the twelve o’ clock train with great difficulty. Mira, Ba, Prabhavati, etc left by the nine o’clock train. That Laxmi [in the foot note in the diary it has been mentioned that, “She must be Gandhiji’s adopted/protected Harijan daughter”] remained with us pinched  Bapu. He did not quarrel much as he was observing silence. But he did not like it. “Why did you not go with Ba [ Kasturba]?” he asked this a couple of times.”


 6. Volume 15, Year  1931-1932: [Gandhiji:] “...The Ashram which is my family has several antyaj families. And one sweet but naughty girl (in the foot note of the diary, the daughter has been mentioned as Laxmi) lives like my own daughter....”


7.Volume 3, Year 1933: [Gandhiji:] “Take the example of Laxmi. I brought/trained her as a daughter of a brahmin. She is the girl of the ashram. I feel that if I get her married to a Dhedh (Dalit), I will be doing a terrible mix up. Her father wishes that I look for a Dhedh husband for her. If that girl wants to marry a Dhedh, let her marry, but I have to look for only a cultured husband for her. And I did find such a person...And we selected and we decided.  That youth is not in a hurry. The struggle started and the girl went to prison. That fellow says and the girl also says that we will marry only when you get us married. We are not in a hurry. I would consider such betrothal where both observe restraint as an appropriate betrothal, but not a mix-up.”  

[Mahadevbhai:] ‘14-3-1933, today is Laxmi’s day of marriage. Wrote a beautiful letter of blessings to Laxmi. Why was it written again and again to her that “Follow only that much restrain/control over the senses as is possible by you.”

These references in Mahadevbhai's diaries right from the year 1919 to the year 1933, show that Laxmi was in Gandhiji's life as his adopted daughter right from her childhood till she was married. And Gandhiji played a prominent role in Laxmi's upbringing right up to her marriage. I have not been able to find more details about her in the dairies.


However from the details available in Mahadevbhai’s diaries, Laxmi most certainly must have had a lot to say about her life and the impact of having been the adopted daughter of Gandhi. 

end













 




Sunday, 27 September 2015

Remembering the 1981 Anti Reservation stir in Gujarat through the writings of Bhanubhai Adhvariyu

Late Shri Bhanubhai Adhvariyu, Photo and Sketch Credit:Ashokbhai Shrimali and
Mr.P.K Lunechiya



Many theories have been making rounds about the parties/people behind the current agitation by the Patel community demanding reservations in Gujarat. Many theories have been floated about the reasons behind this agitation too.  One popular theory is that it is the RSS/BJP which is promoting this agitation to actually find a reason to do away with reservations all together. This theory seems plausible also because recently the following has been in the news: "Amid the continuing Patel quota stir in Gujarat, RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat on Sunday pitched for a review of the reservation policy, contending it has been used for political ends and suggesting setting up of an apolitical committee to examine who needs the facility and for how long." ( http://www.abplive.in/india/2015/09/21/article720001.ece/Amid-Patel-agitation-RSS-chief-Mohan-Bhagwat-pitches-for-review-of-quota-policy  )


At such a time it would be interesting to know what the respected educationist, social reformer and activist Late Shri Bhanubhai Adhvariyu has noted about the 1981 anti reservation stir in Gujarat and the role of different political parties and players of the time. These select writings have been taken from the compilation of Bhanubhai’s articles in the book, “Rudra Vina No Jankar”. The translation has been done by me. 


Article dated 10-2-981 titled: “Why such ambiguity over the issue of reservations?...The pledge that was taken near the statute of Gandhiji and at no other place to start a movement against reservations, is the saddest episode of the contemporary history...Had the Chief Minister (Madhavsingh Solanki) firmly told the agitating students right at the beginning of the movement that he would prefer to give up power rather than go against the constitution and the values established by Mahatma Gandhi, this agitation would not have spread so much...medical students and association of doctors...have quoted the CM and the Home Minister (Prabodh Raval) in newspapers that they are in agreement with their demands (demands of the anti reservation agitation and have quoted the leaders as having said:), “But considering the pressures of the  political scenario, our inner voice has been suffocated.” This is a very serious charge, and they (CM and Home Minister) should deny it. And if this charge is true, Prabodhbhai and Madhavsinghbhai should tender their resignations...

"...the silence of Bhartiya Janta Party which has been accused of having instigated this (1981) agitation is both mysterious and incomprehensible. They have not opened their mouths as much as to refute the allegations against them. The Secretary or the President of the party (BJP) has not said as much that they support the statement issued by the Harijan cell which is run with its (party) support...the only pleasing exception among the political parties is that of the Gujarat Marxist Party (CPM)...the State President of the party Chandubhai Patel has issued a statement. All those upper and lower caste students who desire for a collective development will stand in agreement with the sentiment behind this statement ...”



Article dated 17-7-1981: “In Gujarat there are 15% Adivasi, 7% Harijans, and 40% castes that fall under the Baxi Panch. If other deprived and resource less castes are included then in Gujarat, the high caste is mere thirty percentage of the population...nearly seventy percentage of the population of Gujarat is living partly as slaves due to blunted/retarded development and lack of resources...if this community arises and becomes fierce, they can bring to a standstill (and closure) the cultural hub of the upper castes- the cities, markets, shopping centers, societies...and when such a closure will come,...it will be a permanent closure and this should be noted by the upper caste capitalists and the conservatives...”


Article dated 24-2-1981: “The capitalist and conservative constituents of the anti reservation stir should be thanked in one way because their propaganda against the backward classes has helped automatically to unite as never before the large population of the Bahujan samaj (the masses) in Gujarat...” 



Article dated 24-March-1981, titled: “Various dimensions of the struggle: After the commencement of the anti reservation stir, Chatra Yuva Sangharash Vahini, Gujarat and Medico Friends Circle have together at Vadodara, published a special issue concerning reservations...


"...In the foreword of this publication, it has been stated that, ‘During the movement several questions have come to the fore, for example the aggressive struggle between the upper caste and the Dalits...the behavior of the police towards the upper caste and the behavior of the upper caste towards the police...the behavior of the police towards Dalits...Government policies...the role played by newspapers... the role played by professionals, business class... (and) all of this should be discussed in detail. However due to it being of primary importance and also because of limited space, we have mainly focused on one particular issue (in the publication)... Nevertheless the article titled, ‘Searchlight on the so called intellectuals’ covers our response to most of the other questions also.’


(Bhanubhai:) "... There are two special features of this publication. One is that the Chatra Yuva Sangharsh Vahini youths by taking the pro poor and pro backward class approach more than their sarvodayi elders have proved that in Gujarat even now,  new blood and new life is beating in the Gandhian thoughts/philosophy... moreover the youth of Vahini have discovered their area of work and are doing foundation/basic work. Ambrish and Kirit Shah are traveling/visiting the remote Adivasi villages of Baroda and Bharuch Districts that are going to submergence because of the Narmada project.They are raising voice against the exploitation of workers in the factory of Fluorspar at Kadipani...Ishwar Makwana along with his upper caste colleagues is organizing the Harijan youth in those villages of Mehasana where Harijans have had to suffer during the (anti reservation) movement... 

"...The second feature of this publication is of the two youths of Medico Friends Circle- Dr. Ashwin and Dr.Anil Patel. During the freedom struggle, doctors and lawyers had played a very creditable role. As time went by, like in every other sector, in this sector also, economic factors have become dominant. As a result, in this (anti-reservation) agitation one section, the doctors and lawyers instead of bending towards progressive thinking turned towards reactionary actions; the exception to this is that of the doctors of the Medico Friends Circle...these doctors are different from those doctors in the city who are engaged in treating rightly or wrongly the upper and middle class people. In Delhi, working in the slums is Dr. Imrana Zaheer, working among the Santhals of Madhya Pradesh is Dr Bang, and the doctors sitting at Dharampur, Gujarat (Dr. Ashwin) and Mangrol, Rajpipla (Dr. Anil Patel) are the doctors of the working class people...


"...There is a letter from a reader...he says that on 24th of February there was a rally on behalf of Jyotiba Phule Pratishthan in Pune by the Dalits against the (anti reservation) movement in Gujarat. This rally was lead by  Maharashtra’s Janta Party leader Shri S. M. Joshi. The other leaders who participated were Shri Nanasaheb Gore, Mohan Dhariya, etc...The Janta Party of Gujarat instead of taking such a clear stand (as in Maharashtra) seems to be waiting in anticipation for the power to fall from the Congress and come to them like a jackal waiting under a tree in anticipation of the puree to fall from the crow’s mouth sitting on the tree. Had Madhavsinghbhai and Babubhai (Babubhai Jashbhai Patel, who at that time was with the Janta Party and later became the Narmada Minister during Chimanbhai Patel’s Government) together made it clear that it was their collective responsibility to address this issue then this movement would not have arrived at such an unreasonable stand...

"...even if we admit that among all the Congress leaders in Gujarat, Jinabhai (Darji ) has the capacity to lead all the backward class communities by bringing them fearlessly together on this issue, then too, if he adopts the stand of his party, he will not succeed...He will therefore have to rise above his Party (Congress) stand...he will also have to consider the ambiguous and double meaning statements on this issue by his party supremo (Indira Gandhi) in Delhi  which are similar to all the other party leaders on this issue. Regarding the movement in Gujarat, the summary of what Indiraji has said is that reservations should continue, but by doing that, injustice should not be done to those who are intelligent. Therefore Indiraji believes that continuation of reservation does lead to injustice...”



Article dated 31-3-1981: “Movement: Three pictures...there is one interesting news in the newspapers dated 23-March-1981. There was a rally by upper class brothers and sisters in Dakor on the 25th when Gujarat Bandh (closure) was called. The rally entered the Ranchodji temple. They encircled none other but the God himself. They sang anti reservation songs for hours in the premises of the temple!...let us believe that all the upper class Hindus of Gujarat are with the anti reservation stir. Still, they are just 30% of the total Hindu population. Seventy percentage of Hindu population is in favor of reservations...just because they (upper caste) have the wealth and the status,  they have monopolized many temples such as the Dakor temple. Entry to Harijans is not allowed in the temple and other castes are allowed entry only as ‘second class disciples’...

"...(the monopoly of upper caste on temples is clear from the following incident narrated in the article by Bhanubhai) We had the need to look for a place for a meeting of 50 to 60 activists on the issue of redistribution of lands of a dam in Bhiloda (in North Gujarat). On meeting the trustee of a very famous temple to get the permission of holding the meeting in the guest house of the temple, he did not refuse but said that the permission of the board of trustees is required and to be able to just give a reply, he sought fifteen days of time. Just on the second or the third day of this incident, those who had vested interest in this land, the Patel cum Rajput cum Brahmin landlords held a public meeting at the same place without any permission. Two hundred landlords were present in this public meeting and they passed a resolution to collect fifty thousand rupees to fight against our movement in the High Court...”



Some more information on the caste system of Gujarat and the anti reservation stir of the year 1981 and 1985 in the articles by Bhanubhai Adhvariyu will be covered in the next blog post.


End.

Sunday, 9 August 2015

The struggle against the Sardar Sarovar Project and the history that is less known




It is natural for having been an activist of the Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA) and subsequently a resident of the Narmada valley, to be happy at the following Statement of Professor Shiv Visvanathan in his article in The Hindu dated 6-August 2015: “If you were to ask a middle class person today what the most significant act of history in the India of the last 20 years is, most would say this — the rise of Narendra Modi. But to me, the most important historical event of the last two decades has been the battle over the Narmada dam.” 


 
Mass program at Kasravad, Narmada Bachao Andolan. Photo: Shripad Dharmadhikary

 
At the same time however, I would like to express my concern that much of the media reportage and other documentation have focused on either the issues, or major events or the handful of prominent faces of the movement. The role, contribution and the vision of the local leaders, activists and the common people who have formed the backbone of the struggle have hardly been recorded/reported.One other problem is that while much is known or written about the more recent developments of the Narmada movement, the history of its origin and evolution as also its early years is not fully known. What is not known well is that the earliest resistance against the project dates to 1961 when the foundation stone of the project was laid by Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru. From then onwards the Narmada valley has seen protests and movements around the project, some spontaneous and unorganized, others more structured and organized. These protests prepared the ground for the emergence of the subsequent struggle in the form of the NBA. Thus the protests against the Sardar Sarovar Project have a history that spans over five decades and has many players.





Senior Adivasi leaders of the NBA (L-R):  Vesta, Kemat, Raniya daya, Noorji. Source of photo: From the collection of Shripad Dharmadhikary.

In India it is often the case that a mass movement/people’s resistance increasingly gets identified with handful of names. It is often that the more articulate middle class leaders become the public faces of a movement and many times at the cost of the local leaders who are farmers, adivasis and from the marginalized communities. The sustained struggle of the marginalized communities and their resilience against great odds against powerful forces are less noticed as compared to the dramatic acts of a few personalities. As a result sometimes a powerful people’s movement with a vibrant collective leadership and an awe inspiring struggle of the masses turns into a personalized crusade. What is worrying is that the marginalized communities that are fighting the battle of their own survival every single day of their lives often turn into mere faceless- nameless followers or crowds. Worse still, they are deprived of a rightful place in the history of their own resistance/movement/struggle. 


Senior leaders of NBA: L to R- Poonjabhai, Bhurikaki, Mahesh Patel, Ambaben , Bhagvatibhabhi, Mansarambhai and Vaniya. Photo source: From the collection of Maheshbhai Patel

 
Senior leaders of NBA in talks with the Government (L-R): Muljikaka, Vaniya and Mahesbhai. Source: From the collection of Shripad Dharmadhikary.

In the article “I am Sharmila’, by Kalpana Sharma in the Hindu dated 16 March 2013, she writes- “In India, we elevate individuals and forget the cause. We need heroes and heroines, more so at a time of visual media. But in fixing on individuals, the issue, the cause, the reason for protest sometimes gets forgotten, or under-played.” I would further add here that by creating icons in a mass movement, we do a disservice by not recognizing the strength of the collective and undermine the power of mass resistance. By focusing on individuals, we make it easy for the adversaries and those sitting on a fence to dismiss the cause as a matter that concerns only a few persons and not the masses. 

The movement in the Narmada Valley that began in the year 1961 when the foundation stone of the project was laid by Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru has grown and sustained for over five decades precisely because of the fierce and sustained resistance by the people of the Narmada valley and a diverse and collective leadership. It is time we unfold this history of the struggle in the Narmada valley and of its people that is less known.

End

Friday, 3 July 2015

Struggle around Hathmati dam, Sabarkatha, Gujarat




There have been many struggles around the issue of Dams in Gujarat. While the struggle against the Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP) is well known, there are others like the struggle for riparian rights around the Dantiwada and Sipu dams, the struggle against the Lalpur dam, etc. One such struggle around the Hathmati dam in Sabarkatha district brought to the fore important issue concerning the rights over the draw down cultivation and lands that open up after the waters of the dams recede for a few months in a year. The following excerpts from a write up By Shri Harshad Desai titled, “Bhanu Adhvariyu: Vanchito na hami- Karmashilona prerna strot”, in the book “Rudra Veena no Jankar”, which is a compilation of articles by Bhanubhai Adhvariyu himself, gives details of the struggle as follows (translated from Gujarati by me): 
  
The Hathmati dam. Photo Source: http://guj-nwrws.gujarat.gov.in/mediafiles/image/hathmati.jpg



“...In the year 1979, he (Bhanubhai Adhvariyu) saw the landlords cultivating the draw down land (the land that opens up for a few months when the reservoir water recedes) of the Hathmati reservoir and he immediately realized that the deprived are being subtracted from the developmental projects. In response to this, with the help of a Dalit activist Shri Karsanbhai Parmar from the nearby village Mau, he established the ‘Shramjeevi Samaj’ in the year 1980. The GR (Government regulation) of the year 1966 clearly states that the draw down lands of the reservoir should be given to the landless people from villages on the banks of the reservoir for cultivation. However that GR was buried under the dust of the Secretariat and forgotten. With the help of the commissioned officer Shri C. M. Joshi, he (Bhanubhai) found that GR. That same year in September, about 580 landless people belonging to the backward classes from the area of the reservoir undertook Khed Satyagraha. The landlords tried several tricks but finally at the end of 12 months, the landless got approximately 1500 acres of land to cultivate for the first time on a yearly basis. During the entire struggle, Jeenabhai Darji’s support was received on a continuous basis.  During the initial years of the Shramjeevi Samaj, it not only received support from Gujarat Khet Vikas Parishad but also its familial warmth. Moreover during this initial phase financial support was received from Jaiprakash Amrutkosh...”


In an article by Bhanubhai Adhvariyu dated 4-9-84, titled “Garudi ane Mau: Bandh Vishe Andh Rahe nahi Chale”, (Garudi and Mau: It will not do to remain blind about dams), published in the same book brings to light more problems related to dams in Gujarat as follows:  “In the village Garudi of Modasa Taluka, five people including one woman died in firing. The Government has declared a judicial inquiry into this incident. That is, whether the firing was appropriate or not will be decided by the inquiry commission. However it is necessary to discuss here the reason for such an incident to have taken place and its fall out. 

“As per the news that has been published, those whose lands were going in a dam being built nearby were given the Gauchar land (grazing land) for resettlement. This was opposed by the village people. As per the orders by the Government when the oustees came to cultivate the land, a dispute arose and as a result the incident of firing took place... the other issue is that of proliferation of dams being built. Particularly in Sabarkatha, a dam is being built at every third step. It is a matter of research as to who really benefits from such dams and to what extent. It is a question as to whether the Government will at all recover even at the end of fifty years the expenditure incurred on the dams. In many dams the recovery is not enough to cover even the maintenance cost that is incurred. Actually, many in the irrigation department have established vested interest in building dams. That is the reason why they keep planning new projects. 


“In every dam, some villages submerge and the issue of their rehabilitation somewhere else comes up. This issue is no longer as simple as it was before. Land available earlier is no longer available. The central Government has prohibited the allocation of forest land to the displaced people. Under such circumstances it is not proper to commence in every taluka of northern area, four to five medium or large irrigation projects. The Government should rethink about this. 


Incidents such as in Garudi and other villages are the signs of future.”

The Government of Gujarat did not rethink about such dams as warned/advised by one of its senior and distinguished activists like Shri Bhanubhai Adhvariyu and went ahead with yet another mega dam - the SSP on the river Narmada. However, what Bhanubhai had predicted and had  cautioned as signs of times to come - way back in 1984 has come true. Due to the fierce struggle by the people of the Narmada Valley,  the SSP that was supposed to be completed in the year 1997- remains incomplete even today.
end