LaDha Narmadecha (The struggle/battle of the Narmada)

‘LaDha Narmadecha’, my book based on the Oral History of two senior Adivasi leaders of Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA), Keshavbhau Vasave and Kevalsingh Vasave has just been published in Marathi by Rajhans Prakashan, Pune. This oral history consists of long interviews with the senior activists. The book also consists of extensive footnotes by me.

The Adivasi area located in Gujarat, Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh affected by the Sardar Sarovar Dam. Photo: Rohit Jain.

The oral history of Keshavbhau and Kevalsingh deals with the lesser known history of the struggle against the Sardar Sarovar Dam Project (SSP) that is to displace/submerge 245 villages on the banks of the mighty river Narmada in the States of Gujarat, Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh. Thousands of other people are being affected as a result of related works like the project colony, canals and the downstream of the dam in the State of Gujarat. Over five lakh people are to be displaced or severely affected by this project in the three States.

The narration by Kevalsingh and Keshavbhau gives insight into one of the most powerful movements of the country against one of the most controversial mega dam projects of independent India. It spans over several decades of this struggle to save a river and for life.

Keshavbhau Vasave  at the Right Livlihood Award function in Sweden in the year 1991. Keshavbhau and Medha Patkar received the award on behalf of the Narmada Bachao Andolan.
Source:http://www.rightlivelihoodaward.org/…/medha-patkar-and-bab…/

One importance of the oral history is that besides the struggle against the mega dam, Keshavbhau and Kevalsingh share their own lives as the senior activists of the Narmada Bachao Andolan. They talk about their community, culture, traditions, beliefs, sustainable livelihood they once practiced on the banks of the Narmada and challenges there in.  They talk about the impact the dam has had on their lives, the trauma of displacement and the life in the resettlement sites post submergence of their villages in the dam waters. They reflect on their struggle against destructive development that has gone on for many years now as well as the future challenges. 

River Narmada - the life line, the big giver and worshiped as a mother by the Adivasis, Farmers, Fishing and other communities living on its banks. Photo: Nandini Oza

One reason for bringing out the oral history of Keshavbhau and Kevalsingh at this juncture is that their struggle against their personal as well as collective dispossession is still very much on. Attention needs to be drawn and support needs to be given to them in every possible way so that the serious pending issues of those already displaced by the SSP are taken up urgently and earnestly towards some resolution. 

The Sardar Sarovar Dam has turned the magnificent river Narmada flowing between the Satpuda and Vindiya mountain ranges into a reservoir submerging fertile lands, rich forests and even hills. Photo: Rohit Jain.

Furthermore while Dalit literature/ biographies/ autobiographies are available, there is not enough of such work as far as Adivasi leaders and their contemporary struggles are concerned as narrated by them. Hence it is important to bring to the fore the struggle of people in the Narmada valley from which lessons can be drawn by future struggles for equality, justice and sustainable development.

This is particularly necessary when we as a nation march ahead ruthlessly with the slogan of “Development”. The oral history of Keshavbhau and Kevalsingh remind us what “Development” means to the Adivasi, indigenous, and farming communities of our country. And what is it that they believe constitutes development. It also reminds us that beautiful and flowing rivers across the country are being irreversibly destroyed by building dams and more dams.
  

Living in harmony with nature, Adivasi communities make roof tiles themselves from natural resources. Photo: Rohit Jain.

Basket weaving. Photo Source: Not known.

Grain Storage Muhati. Most of the essential things used/made by the Adivasi communities are/were from natural resources.  Photo : Khedut Mazdoor Chetna Sangathan, Madhya Pradesh.

LaDha Narmadecha gives insight into all of this and much more by sharing the enduring struggle of the people of the Narmada Valley against the destructive Sardar Sarovar Dam and to save from its shackles the revered river Narmada.

Introduction to the Book in Marathi:

पुस्तक: लढा नर्मदेचा...

प्रकाशक: राजहंस, पुणे

नर्मदा बचाव आंदोलन!

विस्थापित होणाऱ्या आदिवासींना लढण्याचं बळ मिळालं, ते या सशक्त जनआंदोलनानं. त्या बळावर त्यांनी आपलं घर-दार, जंगल,जमीन वाचवण्यासाठी दीर्घकाळ लढा दिला. त्या तीन दशकांच्या झुंजीची ही संघर्षमय सत्यकथा... आंदोलनाचा इतिहास, विस्थापनापूर्वीचं अन् नंतरचं आदिवासींचं जीवन, त्यांची संस्कृती, आदिवासी कार्यकर्त्यांची भूमिका अन् योगदान हे सारं या कथेतून उलगडत जातं.या लढ्याचा कणा असलेले दोन प्रमुख आदिवासी नेते केशावभाऊ आणि केवलसिंग वसावे ही कथा सांगताहेत. नंदिनी ओझानी घेतलेल्या त्यांच्या मुलाखतींमधून मांडलेला मौखिक इतिहास –

लढा नर्मदेचा...

Excerpts from the book ‘Ladha Narmadecha’ in Marathi/पुस्तकातील संपादित अंश : 

http://www.aksharnama.com/client/article_detail/1074

LaDha Narmadecha is available offline, and online among other links at:

http://www.rajhansprakashanonlinepurchase.com/view_book_inf…

and 

http://www.booksnama.com/client/book_detailed_view/3746

End

Laxmi, Gandhiji’s adopted daughter, Part-2

In November 2015, I had posted a blog piece on Laxmi, Gandhiji’s adopted daughter- http://nandinikoza.blogspot.in/search/label/Adopted%20Daughter

This post generated some interest and a scholar- researcher Mr. James Takri, kindly shared with me further information on Laxmi including her photograph and her interview that he collected from National Gandhi Museum, New Delhi. Mr. Takri also brought to my notice an article on Laxmi published in outlook in the year 1998 by Saira Menezes – 

http://www.outlookindia.com/magazine/story/bapus-laxmi/204999

Besides the above material I also came across further reference on Laxmi in the following two books:

   1. Ved Mehta’s - Mahatma Gandhi and His Apostles

    2. Arun and Sunanada Gandhi’s book with Carol Lynn Yellin titled – The untold story of Kasturba, Wife of Mahatma Gandhi

However for the issues of copy rights, the material in these books on Laxmi although very valuable cannot be reproduced here. I therefore share Laxmi’s interview and her photograph as collected from the National Gandhi Museum by Mr. James Takri for a wider readership.

 


 

Laxmi with Gandhiji. Source: National Gandhi Museum, New Delhi. As sent by Mr. James Takri

 For those who wish to read Laxmi's excellent interview to know about her as well as her life in the Gandhi ashram, get an idea of her role in the freedom struggle, imprisonment, her relation with Kasturba and Gandhiji, see the link:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4f8XoBOnu_XaWlBY3pDN2N5OEU/view?usp=sharing&resourcekey=0-C1gZtIF0Gi4kSmS-41eenw

I wish to specially thank Mr. James Takri for digging out this valuable information as well as for sharing it with me. I share the same for a wider readership.

end

History of the Narmada Water Dispute Tribunal

History of the Narmada Water Dispute Tribunal 

In 2016-17, the SC ruled (while the Bhartiya Janta Party was in power at the center) that the Sardar Sarovar dam oustees be paid cash compensation and further (as reported in the Telegraph) -

 “the judges asked the 4,897 families to vacate their land by July 31, 2017 failing which the authorities will be free to "forcibly remove them”.

 

This fundamentally violates the provisions of rehabilitation and resettlement laid down by the Narmada Water Dispute Tribunal Award (NWDT) for the dam to be built. The judgement also robs the people of the Narmada valley of their fundamental rights, rights to justice and dignity.

As the SC judgement violates the NWDT award, it would be important to remember the history of the interstate dispute over the dam height between the States of Gujarat, Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh. It would be important to know the history of the formation of the NWDT in the year 1969 under the Inter State River Water Disputes Act, 1956; the declaration of the award in December 1979; the powerful struggle called the Nimad Bachao Andolan in Madhya Pradesh against the NWDT award that had raised the dam height in favor of Gujarat; and later on, the Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA). It would be important to know the role different politicians played in the history of the Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP), especially the role of Pandit Nehru, Indira Gandhi and Morarji Desai. The details of this history, the interstate disputes, the people's struggle against the dam can be reffered to here in the voices of diverse people associated with the struggle: https://oralhistorynarmada.in/early-history-of-the-movement/ 

But here is a glimpse of this history of the Dam, followed by the history of how the Sardar Sarovar Project was conceived and the formation of the NWDT as detailed in the autobiography of Late Mr. Morarji Desai titled, ‘Maru Jeevan Vrutant’ (My life account) marked in blue.  

It was in the year 1961 that the foundation of a much smaller dam than what it is now was laid in Gujarat on the river Narmada by India's first Prime Minister Pandit Nehru. The height of the dam, called the Navagam Dam back then (now the Sardar Sarovar Project) was 161 feet only, see: http://www.sardarsarovardam.org/history-of-nwdt.aspx. However Gujarat state and its politicians wanted a much higher dam on the river Narmada. This resulted into a dispute among the party states as a high dam on the Narmada in Gujarat was to submerge large tracks of fertile lands and forests in the adjacent states of Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra. The dispute over the height of the dam and the sharing of Narmada waters was therefore referred to a tribunal in 1969 as the state of Gujarat was not agreeable to a smaller dam. This was when the Prime Minister of India was Mrs. Indira Gandhi. It was only 10 years later in 1979 that the Narmada Water Dispute Tribunal gave its order in favor of Gujarat for a much higher dam at 455 feet when the Janta Party government was in power in India. It is a wide spread belief in the Narmada Valley that the working of the tribunal gained momentum  only after Mr. Morarji Desai from Gujarat became India's Prime Minister and the height of the dam was increased in favor of Gujarat while the Janta Party was in power. The dam got completed in 2017, also while the Bhartiya Janta Party was in power with Mr. Narendra Modi, originally from Gujarat as the Prime Minister of India.

Some of this early history is shared here as written by Mr. Morarji Desai in his autobiography translated from Gujarati to English:  

Sardar Sarovar Dam. Photo Source: Wikipedia.

Morarji Desai: "In 1947-48, it was thought to implement several irrigation projects in the State of Mumbai [Which at that time included areas of today’s Gujarat and Maharashtra]. Tapi and Narmada projects were accepted then but since statistical information was not available regarding the Narmada project that the sketch of the Narmada project could not be drawn immediately. It was decided by Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel and many of us to first lay out the sketch and implement the Tapi project and after that take up the Narmada Project. When this project was being planned, I was the Chief Minister of Mumbai State. I had instructed several industrialists of Ahmedabad to set up a ‘Nigam’ to give final outline to the project, to administer it and to raise necessary funds for the project. I had promised them that the management of the project would remain with them so long as the Government does not repay the amount they had invested in the project.  At that time the Narmada Project was the cheapest and yet it was not possible to pay ordinary interest. As there was poor response to this, these negotiations were abandoned. When the Mumbai Government first planned the project, as proper statistical information was not available, the height of the dam was fixed at 300 feet. In the year 1960, it was when Gujarat and Maharashtra were separated, that Shri. Jawaharlal Nehru had laid the foundation stone of the dam.

“However due to lack of funds, the construction work could not be started. Keeping in mind the States of Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat, Maharashtra and Rajasthan, in order to study the Narmada Project in-depth, the Government appointed the Khosla commission in the year 1963-64. The head of the commission Shri. Khosla was a well known engineer and an able administrator. He or any of the members of Khosla commission had nothing to do with Gujarat. The commission collected all kinds of data, kept in mind the interests of all the four concerned States[1], and seeing that the rights of none of the concerned States were affected, it took into account the utmost way in which waters of the Narmada could be utilised. While giving its final report in the year 1965-66[2], the commission recommended the height of the dam at Navagam[3] should be minimum 500 or 530 feet. Gujarat gave its consent and Rajasthan[4] also accepted this. Madhya Pradesh opposed this and did not accept this. Due to this height approximately 99,000 acres of agricultural land in Madhya Pradesh would drown in the water. Besides, Gujarat would be deprived from the future use of Narmada waters for only 150 miles where as Madhya Pradesh approximately 700 long miles. It was on these grounds that it had opposed [the height of the dam proposed by the Khosla commission]. Maharashtra where Narmada flew only over 30 miles, joined common cause with Madhya Pradesh and demanded more share in the electricity to be generated. As Madhya Pradesh opposed with fury, it was not possible to implement the project in Gujarat.

“After the fourth general elections, I rejoined the central cabinet ministers. I was not in the Government from 1963 March to 1967. As per the provisions of the constitution, in case of inter State river disputes and decisions by the States there in, the central Government did not have the rights to impose its decision on the concerned States. However the central Government had the rights to appoint a legal tribunal that would hear the petition/ appeal/request of the States and give a reasonable judgement. In order to overcome the deadlock created by Madhya Pradesh, as per the provisions of the tribunal, I requested the Prime Minister to refer this dispute to a tribunal. Smt. Gandhi had agreed to my suggestion and this question was handed over to the legal tribunal in the year 1968-69. Unfortunately Madhya Pradesh by employing several good and bad measures delayed the matter.

“In the election of 1972, Smt. Gandhi had promised the people of Gujarat to bring an early resolution of the Narmada controversy. The people of Gujarat believed that Smt. Gandhi would intervene and give her decision in August 1972...

“...the height of the dam could be kept at 530 or 500 feet but it was also that Madhya Pradesh could construct as many projects in the future as it wished. If Madhya Pradesh utilised all the Narmada waters and as a result if Gujarat did not get any water, Gujarat would not complain is what I am sure of. Yet, Madhya Pradesh was not satisfied because even if its interest were not to be compromised, it did not like that Gujarat got benefits from the Narmada project[5]. More importantly, due to the terrible floods in the Narmada, many areas like Baroda and Bharuch in Gujarat have to suffer excessive loss/damage. This can be stopped only if the height of the dam is kept at 500 feet. When more than fifty lakh acres is to be irrigated, it is not possible to ignore the voices of the 99,000 acres of submergence lands. The landowners of whose lands are to be submerged can be given other land either in Gujarat or Madhya Pradesh and they can be better placed also...

Waters of the SSP enter the villages of Madhya Pradesh submerging homes and fields in 2013. Photo Source: Rajesh Khanna (Bacchu).

“Prime Minister promised the people to bring about a quick solution to this issue, as a result the people were lured and out of 160 seats in the legislative assembly of Gujarat, they gave 140 seats to Smt. Indira Gandhi...Though the Prime Minister had promised to bring about a speedy solution, there was no solution till the year 1974. As opposed to this, she withdrew this issue from the tribunal and kept it unresolved and submitted this issue once again to the tribunal in the end of the year 1974. This is how the judgement was delayed for no reason at all. That one of the two states will have to be displeased and so decision is not being taken is what she had said. But she should have understood this from the very beginning. She should not have promised the people of Gujarat an early decision in the matter. If the Prime minister had not withdrawn this dispute for arbitration, then the tribunal may have announced its decision in the year 1974 itself...”

Rally in Baroda by the Sardar Sarovar Dam affected oustees of Gujarat. Photo Source: Not known.

It would have been interesting to know Mr. Desai’s thoughts on the events that unfolded after the year 1977 in the case of the Sardar Sarovar Dam and the NWDT award as Mr. Morarji Desai became the Prime Minister of India from 1977- 1979. Unfortunately his autobiography – “Maru Jeevan Vrutant”, covers the events only up to the year 1975. It is therefore difficult to know in the words of Mr. Morarji Desai himself from his autobiography what transpired while he was the PM in the case of the Narmada/SPP and the NWDT. However, as stated above, the people of the Narmada Valley in the submergence zone of SSP firmly believe that it was only after Mr. Desai became the Prime Minister that the NWDT gained momentum and it gave its award in favor of Gujarat allowing large scale submergence of fertile lands and rich forests in Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh. 

I also take this opportunity to express my faith that the people’s movement in the Narmada valley will continue as it has continued against all odds over several decades now.  Long live the struggle.

End

---

[1] It is important to note here that Rajasthan is not a riparian State as far as the river Narmada is concerned and yet it was made a party State in the dispute.

[2] Note that the report for such a mega project was given within one year of the formation of the Khosla commission.

[3] Navagam, a tribal village on the banks of the river Narmada, currently in the Narmada District of Gujarat was then the site of the Sardar Sarovar Dam. In fact, the Sardar Sarovar Project was also popularly called the Navagam dam.

[4] There was no land area, villages submerging due to this dam in Rajasthan.

[5] Mr. Morarji Desai belonged to Gujarat. One wonders therefore if this statement exhibits bias because Madhya Pradesh indeed had its valid reasons to oppose the 530 feet dam that was to submerge thousands of acres of agricultural land, forests and displace large number of people.