I happened to attend an International conference in Feb 2015 at SNDT women’s university, Mumbai, organised by the Research Centre for Women’s Studies. The main theme of the conference was: Shifting Contours, Widening Concerns: Women’s History, Historiography and Politics of Historical Representation.
In the conference some of the papers were excellent. To name a few:
1.
Presentation
by Dr. Shalini Shah titled ‘Historical Sources and the Masculine Politics of
Representation in Sanskrit Texts.’
2.
Presentation
by Prof. Kanchana Mahadevan, titled ‘Feminist Histories and Critical
Interpretation.’
3.
Presentation
by Prof. Uma Chakravarty, titled, ‘Conjugality and its Discontents: A Story
Told Through Photographs.’
4.
Presentation
by writer and activist Ms. Urmila Pawar, titled, ‘We also made History.’
However many of the presentations in the plenary
session took up far more time than what was allocated to the presenters leaving
less than the allotted time for the technical sessions. I was also told by some
young researchers that this is often the case in such conferences where the
technical sessions are left with less time. However in spite of the limited
time, many interesting papers were presented in the technical sessions and to
name a few:
1.
Presentation
by Ms. Varsha Shenoy titled, ‘Location/Re-location of women in the
private/public spheres in the context of the Swadeshi movement.’
2.
Presentation
by Ms. Swagata Basu titled, ‘Mapping the Un-represented Self: A Feminist
Geographical Exposition of Politics of Naming Places in Colonial and Post
Colonial India.’
3.
Presentation
by Ms Shazia Salam titled, ‘History, Fiction
and Representation: Muslim Women and Partition of India.’
One another important thing I noticed was that many
of the presentations were based either on secondary sources and data or
interpretation of writings/research already done in the past. Concern was also
raised at the conference by many of the participants regarding the squeeze in
resources for the subject of History in general.
I also wish to elaborate a little more on one
particular presentation in the plenary session. In the paper titled “Reading
Histories of Contemporary Women’s Movement: Diverse Contexts Questions and
Narratives”, the presenter, Prof. Indu Agnihotri, Director, Centre for Women’s
Development Studies, New Delhi, mentioned some of the events that have become
important for the women’s movement in the country. Among these, she
mentioned events right from “1984 riots” to the recent Nirbhaya rape case.
While the presentation was interesting, the several peoples movements and
struggles’ in our country around the issue of life, livelihood, environment,
against “developmental” projects requiring large scale acquisition of lands and
therefore leading to large scale displacement, were absent from the
narrative.
I was surprised at this omission because in these
struggles large number of women – adivasi, peasant, dalit, landless, women from
the middle class, etc. have played exemplary roles, often cutting
the caste, class, religious divide in a significant way. Moreover many of
these women, while fighting to save their homes, lands, water, forests, and
livelihoods have faced brutal repression, at the hands of both, the vested
interests and the State. It is important to note here that women have played
important roles in these struggles right from the time of the Mulshi Satyagraha
in the early 1920s to the more recent Chipko Movement, the Baliapal Movement,
the struggles in the Narmada valley, fish workers struggles, the struggle in
Nandigram, Singur, the Kalinganagar struggle to name just a few.
A program of Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA) in the late eighties against the Sardar Sarovar Project. Photo By Shripad Dharmadhikary. |
Women opposing as part of NBA the Maheshwar dam on the river Narmada, one of the first privatized projects in the country. Photo Source: Not Known. |
As an activist and a writer, I would be happy to
see the many people’s movements against the so called development
projects/model, find a place of significance in the contemporary history of
India. I would also be happy to see that the contemporary women's history also recognizes in a significant way the assertive and powerful role women have played in shaping the policies of our country.
Very good piece
ReplyDeleteEXCELLENT ANALYSIS. AND SUMMARY . tHE VIEWS EXPRESSED BY nANDINI ARE OF VALUE. HER INSISTENCE THAT THE NON VIOLENT STRUGGLES OF WOMEN MUST RECEIVE A much greater attention is , IN MY OPINION WHOLLY VALID. Devendra Oza
ReplyDeleteoNE MORE POINT.
I am Surprised that the ELECTORAL behaviour of women is hardly ever analysed or debated. Hope some day someone will do it.